.NET (CLI vs COM+)

ImageMagickObject is a Windows COM+ interface to ImageMagick. COM+, Visual Basic, and Delphi users should post to this discussion group.
Post Reply
voidvector

.NET (CLI vs COM+)

Post by voidvector »

I do development in .NET with C#. Right now I have an application that calls the command-line convert.exe. Would it be significantly beneficial for me to convert it to use a COM+ hook? How much refactoring would I need to do if I were to convert it to use COM+?
jmaeding
Posts: 54
Joined: 2006-05-03T09:48:26-07:00

Re: .NET (CLI vs COM+)

Post by jmaeding »

I have the same question, so will run some tests to see which is faster.
James Maeding
Civil Engineer / Programmer
jmaeding
Posts: 54
Joined: 2006-05-03T09:48:26-07:00

Re: .NET (CLI vs COM+)

Post by jmaeding »

I am seeing identical perforamce times so far.
I tried identify, and convert on large images.
I just use my stopwatch, but the numbers are the same to about a tenth of a second (the margin of error for my fingers...)
James Maeding
Civil Engineer / Programmer
voidvector

Re: .NET (CLI vs COM+)

Post by voidvector »

Ah, ok, I think I am going to stick with the current command line implementation. I think it is easier to debug and understand than the COM+ version
Post Reply