Thanks, it's working nowmagick wrote:We'll have a patch in ImageMagick 6.9.0-10 Beta by sometime tomorrow to address your suggestion.
Search found 75 matches
- 2015-03-07T17:56:26-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8331
Re: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
- 2015-03-06T09:43:02-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8331
Re: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
Download / install ImageMagick 6.9.0-8 Beta tomorrow. It has a patch to improve the results of the jpeg:extent define. I now had the opportunity to test the new windows binary " ImageMagick 6.9.0-9 Q16 x64 2015-02-28", and unfortunately it doesn't work as intended. For example with two te...
- 2015-03-06T09:38:57-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Windows binaries: Wrong version numbers?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3862
Windows binaries: Wrong version numbers?
I recently downloaded an IM update from http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ with date "28-Feb-2015" and the filename... ImageMagick-6.9.0-9-Q8-x64-dll.exe ... but the actual version number from "convert -version" is ... Version: ImageMagick 6.9.0-8 Q8 x64 2015-02-21 It ...
- 2015-03-01T21:10:33-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Windows installer overwrite warnings?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3783
Windows installer overwrite warnings?
When updating an IM release with the windows installer binaries, it complains about "this file already exists". If these files are supposed to be user-changeable and the warning is meant for protection, they would be better placed in %appdata%. If they are stock files that are static, then...
- 2015-02-22T16:04:05-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8331
Re: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent"
Download / install ImageMagick 6.9.0-8 Beta tomorrow. It has a patch to improve the results of the jpeg:extent define. That's great news, IM gets my award for the most responsive oss team :-) I'll have to wait until there are windows binaries to test the change, I'm done trying to compile IM myself...
- 2015-02-21T09:44:27-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8331
Feature suggestion: max. "-define jpeg:extent" (patch doesn't work)
I don't know if you feel this is over the top, but for what it's worth I'd like to do IM internally what I'm currently doing scripted with multiple runs: When defining "-define jpeg:extent" imho what is of interest very often is not to go higher than a certain *maximal* size, not to have a...
- 2014-12-31T09:58:37-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: 6.9.0-1 and default output formats
- Replies: 9
- Views: 8606
Re: 6.9.0-1 and default output formats
The 6.9.0-2 release is available now. Thanks for fixing this, after trying to debug my scripts to no avail, this is a good incentive to visit the IM forum :-) ... I couldn't imagine for this basic fault, actually IM itself is to blame. Probably some regression testing suite to avoid something like ...
- 2014-12-18T02:27:54-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Req: xmp metadata read support
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7188
Req: xmp metadata read support
This request certainly doesn't come as a surprise, and I image you have though about it and decided against it, at least for the time being? Anyway, since I didn't find such a request in the forum yet, here's my case: 1. The imaging world is moving to xmp, so sticking with the iptc tag subset seems ...
- 2014-12-13T18:15:07-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Use pngquant (libimagequant) for quantization to palette
- Replies: 13
- Views: 42255
Re: Use pngquant (libimagequant) for quantization to palette
For the record: As a simple user, I would find it great if this would be incorporated into IM. Sure most of the time you can run a second command line with pngquant after IM, but getting it "all in one" would be preferable because the file size reduction is unheard of with plain IM png8 ou...
- 2014-09-30T06:37:45-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: "label"->"annotate" auto-fontsize problem [invalid, delete]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3660
Re: "label"->"annotate" auto-fontsize problem
By the way, I do not see any font specified in your command. Damn, you're correct - I didn't see the wood because of the trees as my im command line has grown to nearly unmanageable size by now: I've really forgotten the font statement in when probing for the pointsize, that's why it worked with th...
- 2014-09-26T23:24:41-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: "label"->"annotate" auto-fontsize problem [invalid, delete]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3660
"label"->"annotate" auto-fontsize problem [invalid, delete]
I'm experiencing a weird issue I think could be a bug or bad behavior on im's side with the free font "Stark". I'm trying to find the best pointsize to fit a caption into a pre-determined width with "label"... convert -quiet -ping ( -size 1000x -background black -fill white label...
- 2014-07-31T11:27:00-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: How to compile a Windows/MingW static gcc IM [solved/howto]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7959
Re: How to compile a Windows/MingW static IM [solved/howto]
Ok, I've got the solution and post it here for reference. As already assumed, gcc-ld defaults to shared libs if they exist no matter what you tell it, LDFLAGS='-static' or not. The "proper" though intricate solution seems to be to explicitly link all required libs with LDFLAGS='-static -st...
- 2014-07-31T05:27:06-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: How to compile a Windows/MingW static gcc IM [solved/howto]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7959
Re: How to compile a Windows/MingW static IM?
Try 'configure --enable-static --disable-shared'. Now build. Does that work for you? Nope, already did that, sorry for not mentioning it :-o My current research indicates that "problem" is that the dependencies like libtiff are already there by the cygwin package manager system in static ...
- 2014-07-31T02:41:56-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: How to compile a Windows/MingW static gcc IM [solved/howto]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7959
How to compile a Windows/MingW static gcc IM [solved/howto]
The download page http://www.imagemagick.org/script/binary-releases.php#windows offers an all-static version of IM with all dependencies packed into one exe. Problem: I'm failing to reproduce this compilation, with LDFLAGS=-static just the IM dependencies are included but the exes are still looking ...
- 2014-07-31T02:33:14-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Q8 vs. Q16 speed (& hdri)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 32927
Re: Q8 vs. Q16 speed (& hdri)
Conclusion: bigger Q takes longer, but not by much. HDRI has hardly any effect. Great you're doing a systematic test, thanks! Do you have any means of measuring the memory footprint when for example doing polaroid thumbnails of say 4x4 medium-sized 2048x1536 source images? The q difference seems to...